Lead Routing Isn’t Set-and-Forget: 5 Steps to Keep Leads Moving

(And If It Is, That’s Your First Problem)

You can have the cleanest data, the smartest scoring model, and the most perfectly timed nurture… but if your lead routing is broken, none of it matters.

It’s the part of the funnel everyone forgets about — until someone’s high-intent MQL ends up unassigned, floating in the abyss, or worse, routed to a rep who left two quarters ago.

Let’s fix that. And let’s start with the truth: lead routing is not just a tech problem. It’s a strategy problem — and one that marketing, sales, and ops all need to solve together.

Step 1: Sales and Marketing Must Be Involved (Like, Actually Involved)

Lead routing isn’t just a sales ops thing, or a Marketo Smart Campaign, or a magical Salesforce formula. It’s a reflection of your go-to-market strategy.

That means both sales and marketing should help define:

When a lead should be assigned
Who should it be assigned to
What happens if no one picks it up
How handoffs are tracked and measured

This isn’t a “hand it off and hope” scenario. The best-performing teams revisit routing rules quarterly — especially if your ICP, territories, or product lines are evolving.

Step 2: Someone Needs to Own the Tool It Lives In

Whether you’re using Salesforce native assignment rules, LeanData, Ringlead, or even workflow automation, someone needs to own it.

Not just “have access” — own it. That means:

Documenting the logic
Managing change requests
Testing edge cases before updates go live
Understanding how routing fits into the bigger lead lifecycle

Pro tip: If no one raises their hand, make it part of someone’s job description. Unowned tools become black boxes fast.

Step 3: Ops Deserves a Seat at the Table

Most routing errors aren’t because someone fat-fingered a rule. They occur when upstream logic changes and no one notifies operations.

Adding new lead sources, restructuring SDRs, adjusting MQL definitions — all of those impact routing. And if marketing and sales ops aren’t looped in, the process breaks.

Give ops a seat at the table anytime a routing strategy is being created or updated. Otherwise, you’re leaving your funnel to chance.

Step 4: Someone Has to Own Maintenance (Not Just Fire Drills)

Routing isn’t a “build it once and walk away” situation. It needs ongoing care, including:

One-off fixes when reps get reshuffled
Updating logic as your stack or segmentation evolves
Bulk reassignment of old leads when teams change
Testing for gaps after territory updates or new GTM launches

This isn’t glamorous work, but it keeps the entire engine running. It should be scheduled, documented, and treated like any other core ops function.

Step 5: Define Assignment Logic at the Right Stages

Some companies assign on entry. Others wait for an MQL. Neither is wrong — but what is wrong is not deciding at all.

Assign on entry if you want reps to engage early and help qualify
Assign on MQL if you prefer a lead to be warmed up before sales touches it
Use round robins, territories, or rules based on region, industry, or lead type

Just be clear — and be consistent. Nothing burns rep trust faster than seeing their leads randomly assigned or lost in limbo.

Final Thoughts: Treat Routing Like the Revenue Lever It Is

Lead routing is one of the least sexy parts of the funnel — until it breaks. Then suddenly it’s everyone’s problem.

Be proactive. Bring the right stakeholders in. Own your tools. And treat routing like the strategic asset it actually is.

Because when routing works, leads move faster, reps follow up, and marketing actually gets credit for the pipeline it’s driving.

If you enjoyed this post, you may also like: